<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grand National 2010 Weights Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/</link>
	<description>Grand National Discussion, Analysis and Best Bets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me6</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51849</link>
		<dc:creator>Me6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51849</guid>
		<description>it is a bit of a ridiculous competition, based on weights instead of ratings, because if you get the weight compression wrong you&#039;re likely to get most of it wrong, and if you get the weight compression correct then you&#039;re likely to get most of it correct.  It is either feast or famine.

On the other hand, if the competition is based on ratings instead, then each horse is treated as a separate entity, and you are more likely to get a wider spread of scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a bit of a ridiculous competition, based on weights instead of ratings, because if you get the weight compression wrong you&#8217;re likely to get most of it wrong, and if you get the weight compression correct then you&#8217;re likely to get most of it correct.  It is either feast or famine.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if the competition is based on ratings instead, then each horse is treated as a separate entity, and you are more likely to get a wider spread of scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gammers</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51809</link>
		<dc:creator>Gammers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51809</guid>
		<description>Agree with your tally Daniel, and 4 of us still level after applying the tie-breaker.

Honours very much even!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with your tally Daniel, and 4 of us still level after applying the tie-breaker.</p>
<p>Honours very much even!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Edwards</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51803</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51803</guid>
		<description>Well then, it is hard, isn&#039;t it!! Part of it is judging what the compression will be, what horses will get bumped for the Aintree factor, how he will treat the Irish horses.

That&#039;s 2 years now we&#039;ve done this, and nobody has got more than 1 right yet!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, it is hard, isn&#8217;t it!! Part of it is judging what the compression will be, what horses will get bumped for the Aintree factor, how he will treat the Irish horses.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s 2 years now we&#8217;ve done this, and nobody has got more than 1 right yet!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me6</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51801</link>
		<dc:creator>Me6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51801</guid>
		<description>I disagree about it being hard.  It is just a question of judging the weight compression - 6 lbs in this case.  

If we had gone by the ratings that Smith has used, instead of the weight allocated, I would have got 3 correct (AS, DA and WB) for example, and I&#039;m fairly sure most people would have got 2 or 3, or maybe 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about it being hard.  It is just a question of judging the weight compression &#8211; 6 lbs in this case.  </p>
<p>If we had gone by the ratings that Smith has used, instead of the weight allocated, I would have got 3 correct (AS, DA and WB) for example, and I&#8217;m fairly sure most people would have got 2 or 3, or maybe 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Edwards</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51771</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51771</guid>
		<description>Miinnehoma - 10 pts
Gammers - 10 pts
Ewok - 10 pts
TC - 10 pts
Me6 - 10 pts
Teddyt - 10 pts
Desert Orchid - 10 pts
Showlad - 10 pts

Daniel Edwards - 5 pts
Neil S - 5 pts
Sootydoggolf - 5 pts
Brody 5 p ts

By my reckoning...

Anybody disagree?

Just goes to show how hard it is!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miinnehoma &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Gammers &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Ewok &#8211; 10 pts<br />
TC &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Me6 &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Teddyt &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Desert Orchid &#8211; 10 pts<br />
Showlad &#8211; 10 pts</p>
<p>Daniel Edwards &#8211; 5 pts<br />
Neil S &#8211; 5 pts<br />
Sootydoggolf &#8211; 5 pts<br />
Brody 5 p ts</p>
<p>By my reckoning&#8230;</p>
<p>Anybody disagree?</p>
<p>Just goes to show how hard it is!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert Orchid</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51736</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert Orchid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51736</guid>
		<description>Arbor Supreme 10-03
Dream Alliance 10-12
Irish Raptor 10-00
Mon Mome 11-09
Whinstone Boy 10-04

Tiebreaker: Number of horses entered at Tuesday 16th February = 111</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arbor Supreme 10-03<br />
Dream Alliance 10-12<br />
Irish Raptor 10-00<br />
Mon Mome 11-09<br />
Whinstone Boy 10-04</p>
<p>Tiebreaker: Number of horses entered at Tuesday 16th February = 111</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brody</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51566</link>
		<dc:creator>Brody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51566</guid>
		<description>Albertas Run	164	11-10
Mon Mome	162	11-08
Dream Alliance	151	10-11
Arbor Supreme	142	10-02
Whinstone Boy	141	10-01
Irish Raptor	135	9-09

Tiebreaker: 110</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albertas Run	164	11-10<br />
Mon Mome	162	11-08<br />
Dream Alliance	151	10-11<br />
Arbor Supreme	142	10-02<br />
Whinstone Boy	141	10-01<br />
Irish Raptor	135	9-09</p>
<p>Tiebreaker: 110</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Showlad</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51493</link>
		<dc:creator>Showlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51493</guid>
		<description>Here goes...
ARBOR SUPREME 10-6
DREAM ALLIANCE 10-13
IRISH RAPTOR 10-03
MON MOME 11-10
WHINSTONE BOY 10-04
Tiebreaker 110</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here goes&#8230;<br />
ARBOR SUPREME 10-6<br />
DREAM ALLIANCE 10-13<br />
IRISH RAPTOR 10-03<br />
MON MOME 11-10<br />
WHINSTONE BOY 10-04<br />
Tiebreaker 110</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewok</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51384</guid>
		<description>Arbor Supreme 		10,6
Dream Alliance 		10,12
Irish Raptor 		9,12
Mon Mome 		11,9
Whinstone Boy 		10,4

Tiebreaker - 107</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arbor Supreme 		10,6<br />
Dream Alliance 		10,12<br />
Irish Raptor 		9,12<br />
Mon Mome 		11,9<br />
Whinstone Boy 		10,4</p>
<p>Tiebreaker &#8211; 107</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/grand-national-2010/grand-national-2010-weights-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-51200</link>
		<dc:creator>kj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.grand-national-guide.co.uk/?p=669#comment-51200</guid>
		<description>Arbor Supreme - 10′05
Dream Alliance - 10′13
Irish Raptor - 9&#039;13
Mon Mome - 11′9
Whinstone Boy - 10′06

Tiebreaker:- 109</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arbor Supreme &#8211; 10′05<br />
Dream Alliance &#8211; 10′13<br />
Irish Raptor &#8211; 9&#8217;13<br />
Mon Mome &#8211; 11′9<br />
Whinstone Boy &#8211; 10′06</p>
<p>Tiebreaker:- 109</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

